Before the Reformation,
laypersons were not allowed to sing in church. Sacred music was performed by
professionals (priests and cantors), played on complex instruments (pipe
organs), and sung in an obscure language (Latin).
Church
for Men blog
I confess that sometimes I troll certain blogs
and web sites which can be counted on to provide a bounty of ignorance,
especially about the alleged horrors of the Church before the marvelous light of the Reformation began to
shine. I know that this is like shooting fish in a barrel. I know also that
folks who are quite certain that the medieval church was a chamber of horrors
have little incentive to read the massive literature which paints a quite
different picture of the “Dark Ages.”
But running across the quote above while reading
Fr. Augustine Thompson’s wonderful study Cities
of God: The Religion of the Italian Communes 1125-1325, I cannot resist
commenting on this perfectly stated and thoroughly unsubstantiated cliché concerning
medieval religion.
In all fairness this blog raises a real problem for
the mega church give-em-what-they-like crowd. Apparently there is in these circles a
tendency more and more to turn the music into performance and less and less to
have congregational singing. It is no surprise to me. Most people’s musical
experience is listening to other people play and sing and what people like in
music is more or less what the folks who sell the music have told them to like.
As a musician myself - not a church
musician but a fiddle, banjo, guitar player who specializes in the traditional dance
music of the American South – I am acutely aware of the difference between
music which arises naturally out of tradition and music which is the result of
mass marketing, monopoly and advertising. The music I listen to for fun is
mostly poor quality field recordings of ordinary people playing fiddle or
banjo, which they learned from their parents and family. I believe that most of
us are capable of making some kind of music, even if it is only beating on a
trash can, and I vastly prefer this kind of music to anything the music
business is able to produce.
I have no need to sing this music in church
(even though some of it, quite a lot of it is religious music) because I am not
trying to sell my music and I am certainly not trying to support the music
industry. What I want in church music is what I want in secular music—that which
arises out of the tradition: plainsong and polyphony and hymns valued as much
for their theological and liturgical content as for their tunes.
The problem with the current evangelical church
music is its conviction that creativity is a supreme good just as in pop music:
you have to do your own original material. Tradition is the enemy because tradition
doesn’t sell.
Which brings me back to the offending quote. I
am not aware of any medieval canonical legislation which forbade ‘laypersons’
(sic) from singing in church. In fact obviously communities of female religious
were not clerics or professionals but they sang both Mass and Office. Cantors
might be clerics but they could also be laymen. Is the organ a ‘complex
instrument’? Any more complex than the electric keyboards commonly used in many
churches today? I understand that Latin appears obscure to many now. But was it
obscure in the period before the Reformation. Hardly. It was the language of politics and
business as well as of the Church.
From Fr. Augustine Thompson OP Cities of God
p. 239
“That the lay faithful might not fully
understand or mouth the language of the liturgy does not mean that they somehow
failed to participate in the rite.”
“ The evidence is that the lay faithful
understood the rites enacted before them quite well, if not the words
themselves, at least the meaning conveyed thereby. The heretics were
exaggerating to make a point. Italians got the drift of the lessons at Mass
when they took the trouble to listen carefully, as admittedly some failed to
do. But the pious who did try could get the basic message. The layman Francis
of Assisi's conversion came while hearing the commission of the apostles in
Matthew sung at Mass.”
P. 240
Even writing simple Latin prose was not beyond
the capacity of laypeople with a modest
education. Throughout the communal period lay Italians composed hymns, prayers,
and saints' lives in Latin "as if it were spoken language." The
council fathers meeting at Grado in 1'296 order that deacons use no fancy or
melismatic intonations in their reading of the Gospel, because "these
impeded the understanding of the hearers and so the devotion in the minds of the faithful is
reduced."
“ At least some of the simple faithful
considered it worth their while to achieve a working comprehension of the sacred
language of the cult. . . The Church expected even illiterate believers to say
their daily prayers in Latin, and they
seem to have accomplished this feat. A group of imprisoned paupers vowed to
honor Saint Ranieri of Pisa if he helped them escape. After chanting the Pater
Noster three times in Latin, they fell asleep Ranieri appeared to one in a
dream and explained how to break out of the prison. They were to use iron bars
from the window to dig through the wall. The hagiographer considered the dream a
miracle; he took it for granted that the poor wretches could chant their
prayers in Latin."
“In any case, this was an age of increasing
literacy. The father of Saint Venturino of Bergamc (1304-46) personally taught
his son to read his Latin devotions, although hope that the boy might become a
friar may have lain behind the lesson. Paolo of Certaldo, writing in the later
13oos, considered it normal that a boy: learn to read, and read Latin, by the
age of seven”.
Fr. Thompson documents that the laity of the
period were capable and expected to sing much of the ordinary of the Mass,
Kyrie, Gloria, Sanctus, Agnus Dei. The Creed might have been a challenge but
the people sang a simple Kyrie in response to the Creed to indicate their
assent to it.
I have actually seen this borne out at St.
Francis. In Advent we sing the old very easy and simple daily requiem plainsong
Mass in Latin. The whole congregation, men and women, belts it out loudly and
with manifest comprehension.
The music of the Mass the music of the masses.
No comments:
Post a Comment